I've decided that it's usually correct to organize information (Web information, anyhow) by date. For example, when I wrote the first few entries in ongoing, I was organizing them by category; see the layout under What? to your left. That turns out to be a bad idea for a bunch of reasons.

The past has the virtue that it doesn't change. So if on Feb. 22nd I write a Gardening note, I can just drop it in the 2003/02/22/ directory and name it Garden.

As TimBL has been saying for years, it's a lousy idea to change the URI of a web resource once you've published it. Organizing everything by date helps with that.

This doesn't mean categories are bad; ongoing has the What index as well as the When index, and always will. And these days I'm in the business of making topic hierarchies more usable by ordinary people. They're just a lousy way to organize your authoring.


ongoing
software · G & M · Dad author · colophon · rights
picture of the day
Around February 25, 2003: Iraq, Again · A Lot of People Looking · Good News on Iraq! · Apache Fan Club · Party Like It's 1999!

What?
· Technology (61 fragments)
· · Web (235 more)


Serif · Sans-Serif
I work at Sun Microsystems. The opinions expressed here are my own, and neither Sun nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.