I guess it’s good that Steve and Scott made nice, and there’s no doubt that when the customers tell you to interoperate, then you bloody well interoperate, so it was a good piece of work (see Pat Patterson’s take in a comment on his own blog). But this glue for linking to Microsoft’s WS-Federation is a second-rate solution at best. Among other reasons, WS-Federation is yet another WS-backroom spec that might change (or go away) any time the people in the backroom want it to; not something I’d advise betting on. If you have products from any two vendors that implement Liberty Alliance specs properly, well, they interoperate. Single sign-on? Yawn. Pretty well everybody is a member, oh except Microsoft. If the customers want single sign-on (and they do want single sign-on), Microsoft should bloody well join Liberty and implement the specs, then they’ll have interoperation with everyone, not just Sun.


ongoing
software · G & M · Dad author · colophon · rights
picture of the day
Around May 15, 2005: The Ultra-Rare Breed of Chicken · “An Art of Flawless and Unredeemable Vulgarity” · Hey There, Big Blue! · People in Tokyo · The Web Service Description Space

What?
· Technology (61 fragments)
· · Identity (6 more)
· · Web (236 fragments)
· · · Services (55 more)


Serif · Sans-Serif
I work at Sun Microsystems. The opinions expressed here are my own, and neither Sun nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.