Like your syndication politics tasty and fresh? Head over to DeWitt Clinton’s Unto.net and read On RSS and Atom. Clinton’s at A9, Amazon.com’s Silly Valley search-wonk cauldron, and his stuff keeps coming across my radar in recent weeks. Anyhow, he has what seems to me a clear-eyed and dispassionate evaluation of the feed-format choices facing implementors these days. There is one place he gets it backward, saying: “I’ve been consistently impressed with how well the authors of the Atom syndication format anticipated the needs of the advanced content syndication community.” No; Atom’s design reflects the backward-looking experience we got in the last few years of working with RSS; it turns out that the future is somewhat like the past. But don’t stop when you get to the end of DeWitt’s piece, there are dozens of comments, most of them instructive, coming at the issue from all sorts of directions. Scoble pushed back at length, follow the pointer from his comment. Someone who signs himself “Raja” has an awfully familiar style. And a final note: when Mr. Clinton talks about XML, for example an RSS <description> element, he says <description/>. Now, that’s the kind of pedantry I can relate to.


ongoing
software · G & M · Dad author · colophon · rights
picture of the day
Around July 13, 2006: Boundaries · Another Baseball Proposal · That Open Source Thing · Magnificent Silliness · Apocalypse

What?
· Technology (65 fragments)
· · Atom (91 more)
· · Syndication (67 more)
· The World (90 fragments)
· · Life Online (194 more)


Serif · Sans-Serif
I work for Google, but the opinions expressed here are my own, and no other party necessarily agrees with them.
A full disclosure of my professional interests is on the author page.