I’ve been trying to think of something intelligent and new to say about Microsoft’s recent Office source code maneuver, but Simon Phipps took care of it. Anyhow, when it comes to Office software, I’m less interested in its code (source or object) which should be disposable and replaceable, than I am in its output. Some call them “office documents”; I prefer “intellectual heritage”, “racial memory”, “crystallized thought”, “priceless treasure”, that kind of thing. They need to be taken care of better than they are, I think, and others agree.


ongoing
software · G & M · Dad author · colophon · rights
picture of the day
Around September 20, 2004: WS-Pagecount · 5,000,000,000 per Year · Bad Day at Work? · Market Failure · Fionnuala

What?
· Business (53 fragments)
· · Microsoft (12 more)
· · Open Source (38 more)


Serif · Sans-Serif
I work at Sun Microsystems. The opinions expressed here are my own, and neither Sun nor any other party necessarily agrees with them.